PATENT IN SOUTH KOREA
PATENT IN South Korea includes three stages: PATENT SEARCH in South Korea, South Korea Patent filing and South Korea Patent registration. All with affordable fees.
– Stage 1: PATENT SEARCH IN SOUTH KOREA
Scope of work: PATENT SEARCH | Word mark
($US) |
Device (logo) And/Or Word Mark
($US) |
For the 1st class | 100.00 | 185.00 |
For the 2nd class | 80.00 | 150.00 |
Duration | 5-8 days |
– Stage 2: TRADE FILING IN SOUTH KOREA
Scope of work: Filing Patent Application | FEE
($US) |
For the 1st class | 400.00 |
For the 2nd class | 350.00 |
Duration | 16-18 months |
– Stage 3: Patent REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE IN SOUTH KOREA
Scope of work: Obtaining Patent registration certificate | FEE
($US) |
For the 1st class | 280.00 |
For the 2nd class | 250.00 |
Duration | 1 month |
* Note: Our Fee for PATENT IN Korea includes all fees (official fee and legal fee); exclude fee for responding to office action, if any.
*For PATENT IN South Korea, The additional fee of US$4.00 will be charged for each of designated goods exceeding 20 goods for each class.
– You could visit here to see Procedure of South Korea Patent Registration.
– You could visit here to check the required documents for filing PATENT IN South Korea
Contact AAA IPRIGHT: Email: [email protected]
Or sending your inquiry by filling the form:
The procedure of trademark renewal in South Korea
The duration of the protection of a trademark right in South Korea is 10 years from the date of registration of the trademark, which may be renewed every 10 years. For the renewal of trademark registration, an application for the renewal should be filed at KIPO. A renewal application should be filed within 1 year before the expiration date. The renewal can be requested within the year before the expiration date. In case of late renewal of registration, it should also [...]
Blackpink’s follow-up Babymonster in danger of lawsuit with Monster Energy
Blackpink’s subsidiary group, Babymonster, faces potential legal action from Monster Energy over alleged trademark infringement. The determination of whether two marks are confusingly similar hinges on consumer perception. This principle emerged prominently in the case of Monster Energy Company v. YG Entertainment. Monster Energy contested YG Entertainment’s trademark registration for the marks BABYMONSTER and BABYMONSTERS, citing confusing similarity and passing off. Monster Energy, a prominent player in the global energy drinks market, clashed with YG Entertainment, a South Korean entertainment agency [...]
New Trademark Procedures in Korea – Essential Considerations for Businesses
In October 2023, South Korea enacted a new trademark law aimed at introducing greater flexibility to its stringent trademark registration process, which historically mandated complete uniqueness for later-filed marks compared to existing marks. The existing law in Korea dictated that a later-filed mark, resembling a senior mark already registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), would face rejection. This necessitated the implementation of the “assign back” system. Under the “assign back” system, the rejected later-filed-similar mark, referred to as [...]
South Korea to work closely with the Middle East in IP matters
The Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) is actively working to strengthen collaboration in the intellectual property field with agencies in the Middle East. KIPO Commissioner Insil Lee held meetings with officials in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates during her official visit to the region. The discussions led to agreements to implement a training program for UAE patent examiners developed by KIPO. The collaboration also includes efforts to assist startups and small enterprises, integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into the [...]
Korea Copyright Commission opens copyright museum in South Korea to increase copyright awareness
The National Copyright Museum in Jinju, South Gyeongsang, was officially opened through a collaborative initiative between the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism and the Korea Copyright Commission. This newly established government-operated museum aims to provide diverse hands-on experiences for young Koreans, enabling them to easily comprehend matters related to copyright. During the inauguration ceremony, Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism Yu In-chon highlighted the essential nature of safeguarding the rights of creators as a fundamental requirement for advancing culture, [...]
Intellectual property surplus reaches a new record high in South Korea
In the first half of this year, South Korea’s intellectual property surplus increased to a new high due to a smaller industrial property rights deficit. South Korea sets a new record for its intellectual property surplus According to the Bank of Korea, trade in intellectual property rights achieved a record surplus of 370 million US dollars from January to June, surpassing the previous high of 350 million dollars in the second half of 2019. It decreased from a deficit of 1.21 billion [...]
Hong Kong in collaboration with Japan and South Korea to fight IP violations
Hong Kong Customs has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Content Overseas Distribution Association (CODA) in Japan and the Copyright Overseas Promotion Association (COA) in South Korea in the wake of the IP infringement contents of these 3 countries are currently at large in the Asia region. Nowadays, with the overcovering of the Internet worldwide, the people from one jurisdiction are not limited to the contents of that jurisdiction anymore. Rather, one user from one country will be [...]
Korea: Collective mark right for a geographical indication
A geographical indication enables one business to exclude other competitors from using a certain mark, but unlike a trademark, it has no “exclusive owner.” Both a trademark and a geographical indicator serve the purpose of displaying the origin and quality of goods in relation to company earnings while also gaining intellectual property protection. Based on these parallels, some nations protect geographical indicators as a trademark under a trademark and geographical indication protection statute, while others protect geographical indications as a [...]
Frequencly Asked Questions
The required documents for renewal a trademark in South Korea is Power of Attorney. The grace period is 06 months from the expire date of the trademark registration.
The trademark registration may be recorded online on customs data, but it is not automatically mechanism.
A trade mark shall be registered for a period of 10 years from the registration date
A trademark must be used in the commercial scale within three years after its registration, or within the three years immediately preceding the filing date of any non_-use cancellation action. However, there are no definition of “Commercial scale”.
The cancellation of trademark registration in South Korea is available. A trademark may be cancelled where:- The registered trademark conflict with the earlier trademark;
– The trademark consists the signs are undistinguishable such as the sign indicates the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose or value of goods/services or other characteristics of goods or services.
– The marks that breach the copyright of another parties.
– The mark that are similar or identical with the well-known trademark;
– The mark that are similar or identical with the armorial bearings, flags and other state emblems;
– The mark that are conflict with the protected industrial design or geographical indication.
– The mark is generic;
– The mark is against the public policy or morality of the social.
– The mark that are deceive the public.
Any parties have the right to file opposition against an applied trademark before it has been granted the protection
Proof of use is not required for obtaining the protection of trademark. However, it is required to have Proof of use for defending the trademark against the non-use claim.
After getting trademark registration, the owner of trademark has the right to defence the trademark against the infringement action, unfair competition, unlawfully use of the trademark or have the right to license or transfer the trademark registration to another party.